0:11
Acrylic, Explained
Acrylic is a cheap, wool‑like fiber made from a petroleum‑based polymer, so it’s essentially plastic. One lab‑scale study measured about 730 000 micro‑fibers released from a single wash, which is a clear sign of its shedding problem. The material doesn’t biodegrade and there’s no practical recycling route, and the manufacturing process can pose health risks for workers.
If you already own acrylic pieces, you can cut the shedding by washing them in cold water, using a gentle cycle, and catching the fibers with a microfiber filter bag. Swapping to natural fibers—organic cotton, linen, wool, or recycled blends—reduces the plastic load in your wardrobe.
France just passed a law that adds a small penalty to ultra‑cheap clothing, scaling up to €10 by 2030, bans influencer ads for those brands, and forces sites to point shoppers toward repair and reuse. It’s a first step toward tackling fast‑fashion waste, and it aligns with Plastic‑Free July’s push to keep soft plastics out of the waste stream.
PlushBeds earned a refreshed rating for its organic latex mattresses and bedding, backed by multiple certifications and a mattress‑recycling program. I’m also mulling a guide on AI’s sustainability footprint—let me know if that would be useful.
1:38
Tiny Kia EDC camper van is amazingly simple but brilliantly versatile
Camper builders around the world have been having their first cracks at the highly anticipated Kia PV5 electric van. Dutch outfit Vantrack becomes one of the latest, somehow creating an innovative layout that surpasses the American-designed "Ikea Kia kit" in clean simplicity and versatility. The shop's Lightcamp package quickly transforms the PV5 Passenger van into a smart mini-camper with indoor/outdoor kitchen and sleeping space for four people. And it does so with light, fast-removing equipment that makes for easy conversion back to an everyday e-MPV.
Category: Campervans, Adventure Vehicles, Outdoors
Tags: mini-campervan, Campervan, electric-camper, Modular, Kia, Outdoors and Camping, Camping
2:32
Blue Origin's ambitious plans to relaunch New Glenn this year
Blue Origin’s New Glenn rocket blew up on a test flight in May, and the company is now focused on fixing the damage and getting the vehicle back on the launch pad before the year ends. The explosion was a single event, not part of a pattern, so the risk assessment is based on that one incident and the subsequent engineering review.
The team has already taken apart the wreckage, identified a faulty valve that caused the failure, and is redesigning that component with a more robust backup. They’re also running a series of ground‑based tests to confirm the new hardware holds up under the same pressures the rocket will face in flight.
Blue Origin says they expect to complete the hardware fixes and a full system checkout by late summer, with a test launch slated for the fall. If those milestones stay on track, the first operational New Glenn mission could still happen before the calendar flips to 2025.
Meanwhile, NASA is keeping an eye on the schedule but isn’t pushing the timeline; they’ll certify the rocket once the company demonstrates the fixes meet safety standards. So, while the setback was significant, the path forward is clear, and the next launch window looks realistic if the repair work proceeds as planned.
4:00
Varroa risk to Tasmanian crop pollination
So, there's this study out of the Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture that's looking at what could happen if Varroa mites show up in Tasmania. They're worried because Varroa has already caused a lot of problems on the mainland, basically decimating some European honeybee colonies. The issue is that managed bee colonies can be monitored and treated, but feral colonies – which are basically just wild bees – can't be controlled. If Varroa gets established in Tasmania, it's likely to be a bigger problem for the feral colonies.
The researchers are saying that if Varroa does become a problem, it could have a big impact on crop pollination in the state. I mean, we're talking about a significant loss of pollinators, which could affect everything from apples to blueberries. The good news is that the researchers are trying to figure out what we can do to prevent it from happening in the first place.
One of the things they're looking at is how to monitor for Varroa in feral colonies. They're also trying to develop some strategies for controlling the mites if they do show up. It's all pretty new, but the researchers are optimistic that we can head off a major problem if we act now.
It's worth noting that Varroa isn't just a problem for honeybees – it can also affect other types of bees and even native pollinators. So, this is a pretty big deal, and it's good that the researchers are on top of it.
The study's authors are saying that we need to be proactive about preventing Varroa from getting established in Tasmania. They're recommending that beekeepers and farmers work together to monitor for the mites and develop some strategies for controlling them. It's a big job, but it's definitely doable if we're all on the same page.
6:01
things to put inside your journal
Journaling feels less like a task and more like a quiet space you carve out for yourself. It’s not about perfect prose; it’s about letting thoughts, feelings, and little moments settle on the page, which can be surprisingly grounding and therapeutic. Think of your notebook as a tiny time capsule—something you can return to later, seeing the same day through fresh eyes.
If you want to make those pages feel alive, tuck in tangible bits: cinema or concert tickets, pressed flowers, a favorite receipt, a Polaroid strip, a handwritten note, or even a dried tea bag. Small textures—ribbons, fabric swatches, wax seals—add charm, while doodles or song lyrics capture the mood of a moment. These fragments turn a simple journal into a curated collection of the everyday you’ll want to revisit.
6:58
my favorite classic literature books
I’m glad you asked—this piece is really a love letter to the books that have shaped the author’s sense of the world. It starts by saying that classic literature feels like a lifeline, not just because of the stories, but because those stories teach us how to feel, to sit with the big questions that science alone can’t answer. The writer reflects on a past moment when a professor tried to push them into English as an “easier” path, only to have that expectation backfire and lead to a double major in both the humanities and the sciences.
From there, the article argues that the humanities aren’t a consolation prize; they’re essential to understanding human nature. The author points out that novels like Dostoevsky’s *The Brothers Karamazov*, Baldwin’s *Giovanni’s Room*, and Tolstoy’s *Anna Karenina* each hold up mirrors to our own struggles with faith, identity, love, and morality. The list then moves into the gothic and horror tradition—Shelley’s *Frankenstein*, Stoker’s *Dracula*, Stevenson’s *Jekyll and Hyde*, and a handful of lesser‑known but powerful works such as *Carmilla* and *The Monk*—showing how those stories probe the darkness inside us.
The piece also highlights more modern, psychologically driven novels: Henry James’s *The Turn of the Screw*, Shirley Jackson’s *We Have Always Lived in the Castle* and *The Haunting of Hill House*, and Toni Morrison’s *The Bluest Eye*. Each is presented as a way to confront isolation, trauma, and the ways society shapes our self‑image. Finally, the author wraps up with a few quieter, introspective works—*Villette*, *Brideshead Revisited*—that linger in the mind long after the last page, especially in the stillness of winter.
In short, the article invites anyone who’s never tried a classic to start now, and reminds longtime readers why these books still matter: they ask us to slow down, think deeply, and feel a little less alone in the vast complexity of existence.
9:11
how to find interesting articles in a sea of clickbait
I’ve been thinking about how to cut through the click‑bait tide and land on pieces that actually stretch your mind. The core idea is to split your approach into two habits: curating a handful of sources you trust, and doing purposeful searches when a spark of curiosity hits. Curated sources—think long‑form outlets like The New Yorker, London Review of Books, Aeon, and niche newsletters from those places—deliver depth without you having to hunt. Adding a few independent writers on Substack or Medium can fill the gaps with fresh, original essays that don’t fit mainstream molds.
When a topic catches your eye, treat it like a mini‑research project. Start with academic databases such as JSTOR or Project MUSE, which host peer‑reviewed articles that go beyond surface‑level commentary. Google Scholar works the same way, and a quick “pdf” tag alongside your keywords often pulls free university PDFs, lecture notes, or unpublished manuscripts you’d otherwise miss. Those tools let you dig into the real scholarship behind a subject.
The next step is to read actively, not just absorb. Jot down a line or two that resonates, chase any citation that looks promising, and let those threads lead you to other writers or older books. Over time you’ll build a personal web of publications, essays, and thinkers that constantly feed each other, turning casual reading into a habit of thoughtful exploration.
Finally, give yourself permission to wander. Some of the most rewarding pieces appear when you follow a footnote or click a link you hadn’t planned to visit. Staying curious, intentional, and a little bit messy in your searches keeps the internet’s endless library from feeling like a wasteland and turns it into a treasure map for ideas you’ll love.
11:13
can intellectual intimacy replace physical desire?
The piece argues that desire can start in the mind before the body, citing Anaïs Nin’s journals and Plato’s *Symposium* to show how language, thought, and challenge can spark a pull stronger than touch.
It contrasts Augustine’s view that all longing is a misdirected yearning for the divine
11:38
how to read philosophy (without losing your mind)
hello.
philosophy is one of those things people say they want to read—and then never do. not because they aren’t curious, but because no one ever teaches you how. you pick up a book and within two pages, you’re drowning in unfamiliar language, abstract concepts, and footnotes that lead you deeper into the abyss.
the truth is that philosophy isn’t hard because it’s inaccessible. it’s hard because it’s asking you to do something most forms of reading don’t—it’s asking you to slow down. to sit in uncertainty. to question your most basic assumptions about life, death, time, freedom, selfhood, god. it’s not designed to be understood in a single sitting. it’s designed to be lived with. to reread. to return to. to be changed by.
so if you want to start reading philosophy—or if you already do and just want to go deeper—here’s a guide to help you read with more clarity, confidence, and intention.
start with the introduction. always. never skip the introduction. in most other genres, it’s optional. in philosophy, it’s essential. a good intro gives you the historical context, the philosophical stakes, the central questions, and the intellectual lineage the author is working within. you’ll learn what the philosopher is responding to, why the argument matters, and what terms mean before you get lost in the weeds. annotate the intro. underline definitions. circle major themes. it’s your roadmap. if it’s a translated edition, pay attention to the translator’s note too—it often clarifies nuances of language that are easy to miss.
use the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. philosophy has its own vocabulary, and you are not supposed to already know what “substance dualism” means. or why aristotle cared so much about “being qua being.” this is a completely different language, and the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (SEP) is your best translator. every entry is written and reviewed by professional philosophers. it gives you trusted, academic-level overviews of key terms, thinkers, and schools of thought. even grad students use it.
read with a question in mind. philosophy isn’t about memorizing arguments—it’s about asking better questions. every book you pick up was written to answer a question. so bring one of your own.
before reading, ask yourself:
what is this philosopher trying to solve?
what problem are you hoping to understand better?
if you’re reading camus, maybe it’s: how do we live without meaning? if you’re reading beauvoir: can we be free and still love others? if you’re reading kierkegaard: is despair a weakness—or a form of truth?
read with a purpose. let the book provoke you. argue back.
slow down. slower than you think. this is not a novel. you are not meant to fly through it. some of the best reading sessions will only take you through a page or two—and that’s enough. if one paragraph stops you in your tracks, stay with it. philosophy is not about finishing. it’s about metabolizing. let the ideas sink in. allow confusion. be suspicious of speed.
annotate like you’re arguing with a ghost. annotation should be active—not decorative. don’t just highlight a sentence and write “wow.” treat the book like a conversation. leave actual thoughts behind:
i don’t agree with this at all
is this a contradiction?
why does he assume this is self-evident?
mark key concepts, counterarguments, surprising turns. write questions to revisit later. trace how your thinking shifts.
your copy of the book should look like you lived inside it.
symbols help, too (the margin is your workshop)
* = core argument
! = striking idea
? = confusion or curiosity
→ = connection to another thinker
[ ] = counterpoint or critique
keep a commonplace book. every philosopher kept one. montaigne, pascal, even marcus aurelius. it’s your space to collect quotes, fragments, ideas, and feelings that haunt you. it’s not about being neat—it’s about making a record of the thoughts that stick. copy down things you don’t fully understand yet. jot down questions. use it as a map of your intellectual growth.
reread everything. you will not understand it all at once and that’s the point. the first time, you’re just trying to survive. the second time, you start to hear the rhythm. the third time, something clicks. philosophy rewards obsession. go back to the same sentence in a different mood, or a different season of life, and watch it undo you in a new way. that’s when you know it’s real.
read with your body. not just your brain read aloud. walk while listening to an audiobook version. record yourself trying to explain the argument in your own words. let it move through you like music. if you’re an audio learner, use tools like voice dream reader or speechify to turn dense PDFs into immersive experiences. if you’re a verbal thinker, talk out loud. let it live in your mouth. philosophy isn’t just intellectual. it’s physical. emotional. existential. read with your whole self.
don’t wait to be “qualified” to read philosophy. you don’t need a phd.
17:13
how to find your next book to read
hello.
as someone who speaks about literature frequently on substack, tiktok and the other apps, i have been thinking a lot about how easy it is to let social media shape our reading lives without even realizing it. sometimes the books we add to our lists are not our choices at all. they are reactions to trends, algorithms, and other people's tastes. not in an obvious way, but in the way a title ends up on your tbr just because you’ve seen it enough times. the way a cover starts to look familiar. the way someone else’s excitement makes you feel like maybe you should read it too. and before you know it, your reading list starts to feel less like a reflection of your own curiosity and more like a reaction to whatever is loudest.
reading doesn’t have to (and shouldn’t) be reactive. it doesn’t have to move at the speed of the feed. there’s a real kind of magic in stepping outside of the algorithm and finding your way back to the books that you are drawn to. the ones you wouldn’t have found unless you were paying closer attention. building a tbr that feels disconnected from trends can feel like remembering how to listen to yourself again.
here are some ways to find your next read. ways that feel slower, more deliberate, and a lot more personal.
notes on finding your next read…
-local bookstore
what’s your favorite bookstore? go there. not with a list, not with a trending title in mind, but with nothing but time and a willingness to be surprised. wander the aisles. pick up books you’ve never heard of. read the first lines. linger. this is one of the last sacred spaces where you can still discover things slowly, with your hands and eyes instead of a screen. and don’t be afraid to talk to the booksellers. they’re curators. ask them what they’ve been reading lately and tell them what you love, what you can’t stand, what kind of mood you’re in. and if their rec doesn’t hit? ask someone else. every bookstore has its cast of characters, each with their own niche obsessions and literary fixations. there’s always someone who lives for experimental fiction, someone who cries over family sagas, someone who reads nothing but obscure poetry in translation. finding your person, the bookseller who gets your taste, is like unlocking a secret door. once you do, every trip becomes a miniature pilgrimage and a conversation and a new chapter.
-your favorite authors favorite authors
this is one of the richest and most overlooked paths to finding books that will gut you in the most beautiful way. think about your top five favorite authors and ask: who did they love? who shaped their voice, their worldview, their obsessions? many writers speak openly about their literary influences in interviews, essays, and letters. sometimes it's a passing mention—other times, it's an entire annotated reading list. dig for those. google “[author’s name] favorite books.” look for old paris review interviews. scan their personal essays for the names they drop. you’ll start to notice patterns. recurrences. little literary bloodlines. you might learn that clarice lispector swore by dostoevsky. that ocean vuong reads rilke religiously. that zadie smith is obsessed with nabokov. it becomes a kind of spiritual lineage and a trail of breadcrumbs through the literary forest. the books you find this way often feel intimate, like private inheritances. like you’re being handed something sacred passed down quietly from writer to writer to you.
-your favorite literary publications: the paris review, lit hub, the new york review of books, etc.
there is a gold mine tucked away in the digital archives of these literary publications. not just in the latest features, but in the old interviews, staff reading lists, and forgotten essays from decades past. scroll through the paris review’s art of fiction series and you’ll find writers casually mentioning the obscure russian novel that changed their lives. dig into lit hub’s quieter corners and stumble on personal essays that name drop out of print books you’ve never heard of. the best part is that none of it is designed to go viral. it isn’t about aesthetics or book hauls. it’s about literature as a lifelong conversation. these are places where serious readers talk about the books that shaped them, not the ones trending for five minutes. spend time in those ecosystems and you’ll begin to build a reading life that feels both private and expansive, like you’re joining a secret club that doesn’t care about followers, just sentences that changed someone’s life.
(this post is free, but if you enjoy this newsletter, consider becoming a paid subscriber and be part of a smaller circle where things feel a little softer, a little more personal, you’ll get early access to my youtube videos and a weekly media consumption roundup filled with articles, video essays, podcasts, and other references to make you smarter.
