I left legacy media to build something different: independent, honest political analysis with no corporate or partisan agenda.
I call balls and strikes ⚾ — because politics needs referees, not cheerleaders.
If you want clear, concise analysis that cuts through the noise, subscribe today. You’ll get what actually matters—not just what people want you to hear. 🎯
Yes, Donald Trump is deeply unpopular with the average American voters.
Yes, historic midterm election trends suggest that — almost no matter what — Republicans in the House and Senate would lose ground in the midterms.
But, even with those caveats, I think we — aka the collective political class — is missing (or, at the very least underrating) the key reason why Republicans are on the verge of losing the Senate majority: They have fielded a uniquely bad set of candidates.
In fact, of the 14 competitive Senate races on the map this November, Republicans have bad-to-middling candidates in 10 of them! That’s more than 70%!
And that matters — especially in Senate races. While votes for the House tend to be more about party than person, Senate contests — by dint of the amount spent on them and the higher profiles of the candidates — tend to be more personality-driven. As in, people know the two people running for Senate and make an assessment, at some level, of whether they are a good or bad candidate.
Not all bad candidates are created equal, of course. There are the truly awful (Ken Paxton!) and the merely mediocre (Jon Husted!).
Who fits where? Well, I ranked the 14 Republicans running in competitive races — from best to worst! So the 14th ranked candidate below is the BEST Republican candidate running in a competitive Senate race. And the #1 ranked candidate is the worst.