For those with an unhealthy fixation on internet debates, the Candace Owens vs. Andrew Wilson debate was the Superbowl. Like the Superbowl, some participants likely had serious brain damage. Like the Superbowl, its audience was unlikely to learn much about who killed Charlie Kirk from watching it.
Andrew Wilson is a guy who does “bloodsports” internet debates. He’s debated Destiny, Aella, reams of OnlyFans models, and others. Candace Owens is a crazed conspiracy theorist who sometimes cites her dreams as evidence that Charlie Kirk was betrayed, thinks Kirk was killed as part of a Satanic ritual, and believes the CIA stole Sumerian technology and hooked it up to computers to see the future. She claimed that the odds Robinson killed Kirk were 0%, meaning that it’s likelier that you’d throw a dart randomly across the observable universe and hit the same atom ten times in a row than that Robinson killed Kirk. This is the caliber of intellect we’re dealing with.
The debate was a giant dumpsterfire, but it didn’t go how you’d expect.