Historically, I have never had a huge problem with Nick Cannon. This piece is going to get uncomfortable, so the starting point matters. I was not a fan in the way that people who genuinely follow his music or his comedy would call themselves fans — and I want to be clear that the bar for being a Nick Cannon fan has always been set at a very specific altitude. The man is corny. He has always been corny. Nickelodeon corny, beach cruiser corny, twelve children with six women and a king complex corny. But corny is not the same as bad, and I never disliked him. Wild ‘N Out ran for years and earned its run. The Masked Singer is exactly the kind of harmless, glittery television that exists to give people something to watch while they fold laundry, and he hosts it with the right amount of energy. He has worn a lot of hats — television host, rapper, radio personality, actor, producer, comedian. For a kid from San Diego who came up through Nickelodeon, the resume is real. He built things.
And yet.
As a person, Nick Cannon has always struck me as a try-hard. A man in a perpetual audition. Someone who cannot walk into a room without immediately calculating how to become the most relevant person in it, and whose entire public persona is built around the anxiety of what happens if he is not. Try-hard is a word people use lazily. I am not using it lazily. I mean a man who has spent his entire adult life running from a version of himself that he does not believe is enough — and running so hard, and in so many directions, that he keeps ending up somewhere he never intended to be. The corny and the try-hard live in the same house. The corny is the costume. The try-hard is what is underneath it, running on a treadmill at three in the morning.
The evidence is not subtle. It is documented, repeated, and in several cases self-reported.
Start with the Obama BlackBerry story. During his recent ▶Big Drive episode with Amber Rose, Cannon mentioned, unprompted, that he used to have Barack Obama’s BlackBerry number. Not as a relevant point. Not as context for anything being discussed. Just dropped into the conversation like a man who needed you to know that he once had access to that level. That is the try-hard tell in its purest form — the irrelevant credential offered to a room that did not ask for it. It is the conversational equivalent of wearing a name tag to your own house. Nobody asked, Nick.
Then there are the children. Nick Cannon has twelve children with six different women. He has explained this publicly by saying he has a king complex — that he genuinely believes he is a king, and that kings throughout history have enlarged their territory through their offspring. I am not going to litigate his reproductive choices at length because that is between him and the six women doing most of the actual parenting. What I will say is that when Bobbi Althoff asked him to name all twelve of his children, he got to ten and stopped. Just stopped. He forgot Beautiful Zeppelin and Halo Marie — two of his youngest, not some distant relatives, his actual children — and sat there saying “I’m missing two” like a man who has misplaced his car keys. One of those children’s mothers, Alyssa Scott, immediately posted the clip to her Instagram story, because she had already been publicly calling him out for not visiting their daughter in over a month. The king could not name his court. And the same man who would later call a group of Chicago podcasters “young kings” on Instagram had just demonstrated on camera that he could not keep track of his own.
But the most revealing piece of evidence — the one that explains everything else — is what he said about his marriage to Mariah Carey.
Nick Cannon married Mariah Carey in 2008. He married Mariah Carey. One of the best-selling recording artists in the history of recorded music. A woman with eighteen number-one singles on the Billboard Hot 100. A woman who wrote a Christmas song in 1994 that has since become a perennial economic institution — it generates millions of dollars in royalties every November like a machine that cannot be turned off, world without end, amen. He proposed to this woman. He knew who she was when he proposed. Every person on earth knew who she was. And then, after they married, he lay awake at night asking himself — his words, not mine — “Is this who I am? Am I Mariah’s man? Is that what my life is supposed to be?”
He described his career trajectory as being down here, holding his hand low to the ground, while hers was already in a different stratosphere. He said he got really comfortable in the marriage — islands, steaks on a platter at noon — and then when the children arrived and Mariah was rocking being the alpha, he started carrying the diaper bag and feeling like his manhood was under siege. He told the podcast host he started wearing suits every day just to prove he was a man. He began wondering whether his executive roles at Nickelodeon and Island Def Jam were only because of Mariah’s connections. He eventually concluded, and I am quoting him directly, “I believe she needs a dude like that. I’m just not that dude.”
I understand the psychology here more than I would like to admit. Building an identity next to someone whose gravitational pull is that strong is genuinely difficult. But here is what I cannot move past: he knew. When he proposed, he knew exactly who Mariah Carey was. This was not a woman who became famous after the wedding. She did not surprise him with an album and eighteen number ones three years into the marriage. He walked in with his eyes open and then spent years being surprised that she was Mariah Carey. Meanwhile, somewhere on one of her islands, Mariah was thawing out for Christmas and not thinking about Nick at all.
That is not a marriage problem. That is a man who fundamentally cannot exist in a room where the spotlight is not on him — and who chose to leave one of the most successful women in the history of popular music rather than make peace with that fact.
That is the thesis. That is the whole man.
A person secure in who they are does not lie awake in Mariah Carey’s house wondering if he is enough. A person secure in who they are does not drop Obama’s BlackBerry number into a conversation nobody asked about. A person secure in who they are does not father twelve children across six women and describe it as building a royal court, then forget two of the court members’ names on a podcast. And a person secure in who they are does not climb into a beach cruiser with Amber Rose and deliver a half-remembered history lesson from 1865 like he has just cracked a code the rest of us have been too scared to acknowledge.
Last week I wrote about Black MAGA and the performance of rebellion, and since then the situation has developed in ways that deserve their own examination. Cannon thought he was dropping knowledge from that beach cruiser. He had the cadence of a man mid-revelation. He was nodding with the gravity of someone who believes he is saying something the world has been waiting to hear. What he actually said — that the Democratic Party is the party of the KKK and the Republicans are the party that freed the slaves — is not a revelation. It is a talking point. A specific, well-documented, widely circulated conservative talking point that has been debunked so thoroughly and so repeatedly that the debunking has its own citations. Princeton historian Kevin Kruse, asked directly about Cannon’s comments, said he would encourage Cannon and anyone else who stopped reading American history in 1860 to stay tuned for the rest of the book, because other stuff happens.
Other stuff does happen. Quite a bit of it.
The party realignment is not a secret. It is not obscure academic debate. It is standard curriculum in an introductory American Government course at any community college in this country. It is on the midterm. The New Deal coalition, the shift of Black voters to the Democratic Party under FDR in the 1930s, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Southern Strategy, the Dixiecrats migrating to the Republican Party — this is week three of the semester, Tuesday’s lecture, third row from the front. A student who stayed awake through two classes could have stopped Cannon mid-sentence with a hand raise.
And Nick Cannon has a Criminology degree and an ▶Africana Studies minor from Howard University. The Mecca. He chose that minor. He sat in those classes. The realignment is not elective reading in an Africana Studies program at Howard. It is the foundation of the entire conversation. Which means one of two things happened on that beach cruiser: either he forgot what he learned, or he never did the reading in the first place. Neither option reflects well on a man invoking his proximity to the Mecca as a source of authority.
This is worth saying carefully, because degrees mean something and I think we have gotten sloppy about what they mean. A bachelor’s degree means competence. It means you know more about your field than most people, enough to hold a basic conversation with authority, enough to teach it at a foundational level. A master’s degree means mastery — genuine command of the material. A doctoral degree means expertise, and one of the things that doctoral training reliably produces is the recognition that even experts do not know everything. The more you study something, the more you understand the boundaries of your own knowledge. My wife has a bachelor’s degree and an HR certification, and has worked in her field for over fifteen years. That combination of formal education and sustained practical experience gives her an authority on her subject matter that most people in a room simply do not have. When someone says something incorrect in her area of expertise, she corrects it — not aggressively, not punitively, but with the quiet confidence of someone who has done the reading and the work.
That is what credentials are for. Not for decoration. Not for dropping into beach cruiser conversations as ambient credibility. For knowing when someone in your presence is wrong and having the foundation to say so.
Nick Cannon had that foundation. He had more academic grounding on the subject being discussed than Amber Rose will ever have, and Amber Rose is a woman who has elevated not knowing things to an art form. I have covered her at length elsewhere, but for new readers: this is a woman who argued in that same beach cruiser that white people should be allowed to use the N-word, declared herself a former liberal who has seen the light, and delivered both positions with the confidence of someone who has never once been inconvenienced by a follow-up question. When Joy Reid pointed out she was on tape saying she did not identify as a Black woman, ▶Rose went on X and said she never said that — she said she identifies as biracial. The tape exists. Amber Rose knows the tape exists. She simply does not care, and at this point I respect the consistency even as I am appalled by the content.
The point is that Amber Rose is operating entirely on vibes, grievance, and whatever has been fed to her through conservative media. That is her lane. She owns it. But Nick Cannon has the credential. He chose that minor. Which means in that beach cruiser, he was not just a peer nodding along — he was the person in the vehicle with the academic foundation to push back, and he chose performance over responsibility. He took her incomplete thought, agreed with it one hundred percent, and then raised the stakes by adding the KKK line on top. He did not just fail to correct her. He graduated her misinformation into a fully formed historical distortion and delivered it like a professor.
The degree became an indictment the moment he opened his mouth.
Richard Griffin — Professor Griff — was removed from Public Enemy in 1989 after making statements about Jewish people that were documented as anti-Semitic. He said Jewish people were responsible for the majority of wickedness in the world. He was pushed out of one of the most important groups in hip hop history over it. This is not obscure information. Anyone who has spent meaningful time in the cultural and intellectual spaces that Cannon moves in knows who Professor Griff is and knows what ideological tradition he represents. The 2020 incident was not an accident. It was the same pattern — a man who cannot resist the energy of a room, regardless of where that room is headed.
I have run in those circles. I know people who move in the ideological space that Griff, Umar Johnson, and Boyce Watkins occupy, and people who dismiss that entire world often miss something important: they are not wrong about everything. The critique of systemic racism is real and documented. The analysis of how Black wealth has been suppressed, how the school-to-prison pipeline operates, how the criminal justice system functions as a mechanism of racial control — these arguments are often made with receipts, with data, with genuine intellectual rigor. The problem is not that everything they say is false. The problem is that true things are packaged with things that are not true, and the seams between them are deliberately hard to find.
What I have observed, having spent time in and around those spaces, is a consistent ideological destination that has nothing to do with liberation. The hotep pipeline does not deliver the dismantling of hierarchy. It delivers the replacement of white patriarchy with Black patriarchy. The oppressor is correctly identified. The solution offered is to put different people at the top of the same structure, with the same women at the bottom, the same rigid enforcement of gender roles, the same contempt for anyone who asks the wrong questions. ▶Umar Johnson will give you a forty-five minute breakdown of the school-to-prison pipeline that is factually airtight and then pivot to Black women being too independent as the real problem in the community. Griff’s contribution is that the oppressor is real, but also Jewish. The critique of power is legitimate. The ideology underneath it is a rebrand.
This is what makes it more dangerous than outright MAGA nonsense, which at least announces itself. The hotep pipeline comes packaged in enough truth to be convincing to people who are correctly angry about real things. Nick Cannon is the perfect vessel for it precisely because he is not a rigorous thinker. He hears the true parts, gets excited by the transgressive energy of saying things that polite society discourages, skips the part where he examines what else is in the package, and ends up amplifying a worldview he has not fully examined. He sat across from Professor Griff — a man whose entire public reputation is built around that specific brand of revisionism — and nodded along, because the energy felt right and the credential he earned at Howard was being used as a costume instead of a tool.
He was not obligated to publicly humiliate his guest. That is not what I am asking for. But he was absolutely obligated — by his own Africana Studies minor, by his own Howard education — to understand who he was sitting across from and what that tradition delivers at the end of the road. Cannon either did not know, which means his education failed him or he failed his education, or he knew and did not care. There is no third option.
After the beach cruiser backlash arrived — from Roland Martin, from DL Hughley, from historians, from regular people who had taken the intro class — a group of young men from Chicago called The JAAM Podcast posted an eleven-minute video on their Instagram that did more damage to Cannon’s argument than any…
